The Right to Education : A Model for making Higher Education equally accessible to All on the Basis of Merit

Main Article Content

Sir John DANIEL
Asha KANWAR
Stamenka UVALIC-TRUMBIC

Abstract

We commend this collaboration between leading journals in the field to promote the role of distance education in achieving the aspiration of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit. In this Paper we review the past models of higher education institutions, with respect to how well they address the three core aspects of providing access, quality, and cost, and propose a new model that might best provide wider access, quality assurance and at low cost. This new model draws from a new business model that advocates individualization of courses and utilizing global resources. Our model becomes practical when institutions focus on supporting learning, and separate out the role of examinations to central or regional bodies. Adoption of this model, particularly in developing countries, could bring forward significantly the day when the world can say that higher education is equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.

Article Details

How to Cite
DANIEL, S. J., KANWAR, A., & UVALIC-TRUMBIC, S. (2008). The Right to Education : A Model for making Higher Education equally accessible to All on the Basis of Merit. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 6(2), 5 - 11. Retrieved from https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/120
Section
Articles

References

Abrami, P.C., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Tamin, R., & Surkes, M. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage one meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research (in press). Bernard, R.M., Abrami, P.C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Tamin, R., & Surkes, M. (2008). Examining three forms of interaction in

distance education : A meta-analysis of between-DE studies. Manuscript in preparation. Bernard, R.M., Abrami, P.C., Lou, Y., & Borokhovski, E. (2004). A methodological morass? How we can improve the quality of quantitative research in distance education. Distance Education, 25 (2), 176-198. Koul, B.N., & Kanwar, A.S. (Eds.) (2006). Towards a culture of quality – From quality assurance to a culture of quality in open distance education : Case studies and inferences, Perspectives on Distance Education Series. Vancouver : Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from http://www.col.org/colweb/site/pid/3992 Lou, Y., Bernard, R.M., & Abrami, P.C. (2006). Media and pedagogy in undergraduate distance education: A theory-based meta-analysis of empirical literature. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54 (2), 141-176. Prahalad, C.K., & Krishnan, M.S. (2008). The new age of innovation : Driving co-created value through global networks. Columbus, OH : McGraw-Hill. UNESCO /OECD (2006). Guidelines for quality provision in cross-border higher education. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001 433/143349e.pdf