Learning Styles and Perceived Educational Quality in e-Learning
Main Article Content
Abstract
Assurance of educational quality is a fundamental requirement for distance learning development. Factors that influence educational quality include instructional design, teaching styles, learning styles, learning objectives, content, and instructional media. In this case study, we examined the perceived learning quality of the e-learning courses at the National Tsing-Hua University (NTHU), Taiwan. The study focused on analysis of the types of student learning styles and their correlations with student perceptions of educational quality. The instructional model for the NTHU e-learning courses has been a blended-learning approach which integrates asynchronous e-learning with synchronous two-way audiovisual system (JoinNet) and face-toface instruction. In order to examine educational quality, we used the Student’s Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ) survey instrument to investigate each student’s perception of the received learning quality in terms of (a) learning / academic value, (b) instructor enthusiasm, (c) organization / clarity, (d) breadth of coverage, (e) grouping interaction, (f) individual rapport, (g) assignments / readings, and (h) examinations / grading. We then applied the Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Survey (GRSLSS) to investigate any correlations between each student’s reported learning style and the perceived educational quality. The findings showed that male students had higher ratings of the received educational quality than female students; there were three significant positive correlations between educational quality and three types of learning styles, including variables of Participative, Independent, and Collaborative; and one significant negative correlation between perceived educational quality and Avoidant learning style; the educational quality could be positively predicted by two SEEQ factors: breadth of coverage, and learning / academic value. These findings can inform instructors and instructional designers to develop better e-learning environments to improve the educational quality of e-learning.
Article Details
The work published in AjDE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY).
References
73
YANG
Cooze, M., & Barbour, M.K. (2007). Learning styles : A focus upon e-learning practices and pedagogy and their implications for successful instructional design. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 4 (1). Retrieved July 2, 2007, from http://www.eduquery.com/jaet/JAET41_Cooze.pdf Diaz, D., & Cartnal, R. (1999). Comparing student learning styles in an online distance learning class and an equivalent on-campus class. College Teaching, 47 (4), 130-135. Duun, R. (2000). Learning style : Theory, research, and practice. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 13 (1), 3-22. Felder, R.M., & Silverman, L.K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78 (7), 674-681. Garcia P., Amandi A., Schiaffino S., & Campo M. (2007). Evaluating Bayesian networks’ precision for detecting students’ learning styles. Computer & Education, 49 (3), 749808. Garland, D., & Martin, B.N. (2005). Do gender and learning style play a role in how online courses should be designed ? Journal of Online Interactive learning, 4 (2), 67-81. Grasha, A.F. (2002). Teaching with style : A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. San Bernandino, CA : Alliance Publishers. Holmberg, B. (1981). Status and trends of distance education. New York : Nichols Publishing. James, W.B., & Gardner, D.L. (1995). Learning styles : Implications for distance learning. New Directors for Adult and Continuing Education, 67, 19-31. Keefe, J.W. (1979). Learning style : An overview. In J.W. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles : Diagnosing and prescribing programs, (pp. 1-17). Reston, VA : National Association of Secondary School Principals. Kolb, D.A. (1976). The learning style inventory : Technical manual. Boston, MA : McBer. Leidner, D.E., & Jarvenpaa, S.L. (1993). The information age confronts education : Case studies on electronic classroom. Information Systems Research, 4 (1), 24-54. Levine, T., & Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (1998). Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge : A causal analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 14 (1), 125-146. Loomis, K.D. (2000). Learning styles and asynchronous learning : Comparing the LASSI model to class performance. Journal
of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4 (1), 223-232. Marsh, H.W. (1982). SEEQ : A reliable, valid and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 77-95. Melton, J. (2003). Learning styles and educational technology : An overview. Languages Issues, 9 (1), 61-82. Merriam, S., & Caffarella, R. (1991). Learning in adulthood : A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass. Moore, M.G, & Kearsley, G.. (1996). Distance education : A system’s view. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth Publishing. Murgatroyd, S. (1990). Business, education, and distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 4 (1), 39-52. National Tsing Hua University (2007). EMBA in technology management. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://nthu.learnbank.com.tw/ Nulty, D.D., & Barrett, M.A. (1996). Transitions in students' learning styles. Studies in Higher Education, 21 (3), 333-345. Prinsen, F.R., Volman, M.L.L., & Terwel J. (2007). Gender-related differences in computer-mediated communication and computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23 (5), 393–409. Russell, T.L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon : As reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers. Raleigh, NC : North Carolina State University Press. Sarasin, L.C. (1999). Learning style perspectives : Impact in the classroom. Madison, WI : Atwood Publishing. Segars, A. (1997). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement : A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems. Omega, 25 (1), 107-121. Selim, H.M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance : Confirmatory factor models. Computer & Education, 49 (2), 396-413. Sherry, L. (1996). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1 (4), 337-365. Shih, C., & Gamon, J.A. (2002). Relationships among learning strategies, patterns, styles and achievement in Web-based courses. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43, Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http://pubs.aged.tamu.edu/jae/pdf/Vol43/43 -04-01.pdf
74
ASIAN JOURNAL of DISTANCE EDUCATION
Singleton C.H. (2001). Computer-based assessment in education. Educational and Child Psychology, 18, 58-74. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000). Teaching and learning at a distance : Foundations of distance education. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Merrill. Simpson, C., & Du, Y. (2004). Effects of learning styles on students’ enjoyment level in distributed learning environments. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 45 (2), 123-135. Sun-Net Technology Corporation (2007). eUniversity. Retrieved March 25, 2008, from http://www.sun.net.tw/university.htm Suzuki, B.H. (1983). The education of Asian and Pacific Americans : An introductory overview. In D.T. Nakanishi, & M. HaranoNakanishi (Eds.). The education of Asian and Pacific Americans : Historical perspectives and prescriptions for the future, (pp. 1-13). Phoenix, AZ : Oryx Press.
Tsai, C.C. (2008). The discussion of e-learning development from research trend to elearning knowledge domain. Paper presented at the meeting of e-learning : Current issues and methodology workshop. Taipei, Taiwan. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancyvalue theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81. Yang, J.F. (2005). The challenges of Asian distance educational development. AAOU (Asian Association of Open Universities) Journal, 1 (1), 73-82. Yang, J.F. (2006). The discussion of media selection and accessible equity in distance education, Journal of American Academy of Business, 10 (1), 126-130. Yang, J.F., Hsiao, C.M., & Huang, T.L. (2008). The framework to develop a global information technology learning system. International Journal of Information and Technology, 4 (1), 16-23.