A Conceptual Model for Effective Distance Higher Education in Iran

Main Article Content

Mehran FARAJOLLAHI
Hosein ZARE
Mahmood HORMOZI
Mohammad Reza SARMADI
Hahid ZARIFSANAEE

Abstract

The present research aims at presenting a conceptual model for effective distance learning in higher education. Findings of this research shows that an understanding of the technological capabilities and learning theories especially constructive theory and independent learning theory and communicative and interaction theory in distance learning is an efficient factor in the planning of effective distance learning in higher education. Considering the theoretical foundations of the present research, in the effective distance learning model, the learner is situated at the center of learning environment. For this purpose, the learner needs to be ready for successful learning and the teacher has to be ready to design the teaching- learning activities when they initially enter the environment. In the present model, group and individual active teaching-learning approach, timely feedback, using IT and eight types of interactions have been designed with respect to theoretical foundations and current university missions. From among the issues emphasized in this model, one can refer to the initial, formative and summative evaluations. In an effective distance learning environment, evaluation should be part of the learning process and the feedback resulting from it should be used to improve learning. For validating the specified features, the opinions of distance learning experts in Payame Noor, Shiraz, Science and Technology and Amirkabir Universities have been used which verified a high percentage of the statistical sample of the above-mentioned features.

Article Details

How to Cite
FARAJOLLAHI, M., ZARE, H., HORMOZI, M., SARMADI, M. R., & ZARIFSANAEE, H. (2010). A Conceptual Model for Effective Distance Higher Education in Iran. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 18-28. Retrieved from https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/166
Section
Articles

References

Aggarwal, l., & Bento, R. (2000). Web-Based Education. In A. Aggarwal (Ed.), Webbased learning and teaching technologies : Opportunities and challenges. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing. American Federation of Teachers. (2000). Distance education – Guidelines for good practice. Washington, DC : AFT Press. Australian Flexible learning framework. (2003). Cross-cultural issues in content development and teaching online. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from http://www.flexiblelearning.net.au/guides/c rosscultural.pdf Boettcher, J. (2007). Ten core principles for designing effective learning environments : Insights from brain research and pedagogical theory. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 3 (3). Retrieved January
3, 2009, from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php Bransford, J.D. (2004). Critical success factors and effective pedagogy for learning in tertiary education. New Zealand Council for Education Research. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from http://ww.hpcnet.org/cgibin/global/a_bus_c ard.cgi?siteID=179462 Brown, A., & Voltz, B. (2005). Elements of effective e-learning design. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6 (1). Retrieved January 3, 2009, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/articl e/view/217/300 Buford, J. (2005). An introduction to designing and delivering courses and programs at a distance. In K.E. Dooley, J.R. Lindner, & L.M. Dooley (Eds.), Advanced methods in distance education : Applications and practices for educators, administrators, and learners, (pp.1-16). Hershey, PA : IGIGlobal. Chickering, A., & Ehrmann, S. (1996). Implementing the seven principles : Technology as a lever. Retrieved January 23, 2003, from http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.ht ml Cho, S.K., & Berge, Z.L. (2002). Overcoming barriers to distance training and education. Education at a Distance, 16 (1). Retrieved March 14, 2002, from http://www.emoderators.com/barriers/cho.html Colakoglu, O.M., & Akdemir, O. (2008). Motivational measure of instruction compared : Instruction based on the ARCS motivation theory versus traditional instruction in blended courses. In J. Luca, & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008 (pp. 48-53). Chesapeake, VA : AACE. Retrieved January 3, 2009 , from: http://www.editlib.org/p/28375 Devi, P. (2006). An ICT-based distance education model. unpublished doctoral dissertion, Victoria University of Wellington. Ebrahimzadeh, I. (2008). Cognitive concerns in providing electronic education facilities. Paper presented in the second distance education conference, 13 December, in Tehran University. Groff, J., & Mouza, C. (2008). A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use. AACE Journal, 16 (1), 21- 46. Retrieved June 26, 2010, from http://www.editlib.org/d/24421/article_244 21.pdf Herrera-Batista, M.A., & Gonzalez -Martinez, M. (2006). Considerations for the design of virtual learning environments. In T. Reeves, & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning. Chesapeake, VA : AACE. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from http://www.editlib.org/p/23875 Mendenhall, R. (2003). A model and principles for effective internet-based distance education. unpublish ed doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University. Retrieved June 26, 2010, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/downlo ad;jsessionid=7673E0AA374320886D0758 D005349A34?doi=10.1.1.75.8545&rep=rep 1&type=pdf Miguel, B., Mcpherson, M. (2004). Developing innovation online learning, London : Routledge-Falmer. Moore, M.G., & Anderson, W,G. (2003). Handbook of distance education. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Morss, K., & Murray, R. (2005). Teaching at university : A guide for postgraduates & researchers. New Delhi : Sage. Nguyen, D., & Dennis, S.K. (2000). Summative and formative evaluation of internet-based teaching. In L. Lau (Ed.), Distance learning technologies : Issues, trends and opportunities. Hershey, PA : Idea Group. Peters, O. (2003). Learning with new media in distance education. In M. Moore, & W. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education, (pp. 88). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Safavi, A.A. (2008). Developing countries and e-learning program development. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 11 (3), 47. Taylor, J. (2001). Fifth generation distance education. Paper presented to the 20th ICDE World Conference. Düsseldorf, Germany. Retrieved June 26, 2010, from http://www.fernuni-hagen.de/ICDE/D2001/final/keynote_speeches/wednesday/ta ylor_keynote.pdf The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (1999). Guidelines on the quality assurance of distance learning, Retrieved October 12, 1999, from http://www.qaa.ac.uk/public/dlg/contents.ht m Tuovinen, J. (2000). Multimedia distance education interactions. Education Media International, 37 (1), 16–24. Thompson, M., & Irele, M. (2003). Evaluating distance education programs. In M. Moore, & W. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education, (pp. 572). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Watson, S. (2010). Increasing online interaction in a distance education, MBA : Exploring students’ attitudes towards change. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 26 (1), 63-84. Retrieved December 3, 2010, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/watso n.pdf Wedemeyer, C. (1983). Back door learning in the learning society. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education : International perspectives. London : Croom Helm.