Teacher Initial Training : Conventional versus Distance Mode in Pakistan
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study aimed at comparison of the efficacy of Regular and Distance learning programmes of University of Sindh Jamshoro. It focused on the assessment of the performance of the graduates of Regular and Distance learning training programmes in the field in terms of learning competences as perceived by the Heads of Secondary Schools who are utizing their services. Data was collected through a questionnaire and was analyzed through a MANOVA technique. Study found no difference between the efficacy of the B.Ed. distance learning and regular graduates of the University of Sindh, but on the whole the efficacy of the both programmes was found at average level by the heads of secondary schools. They observed the positive trend in teachers and viewed that they possess self-confidence and show willingness to learn, but the training system does not provide them an opportunity to enhance professional competency. The mean scores of regular trained teachers show better training environment in on campus programme as compared to distance learning programme. The teachers trained through regular programme have good performance in the lesson planning, demonstration and classroom management as compared to distance learning trained teachers. The study suggested the increase in the duration of B.Ed. course, balance in the foundation and pedagogical courses in accordance with the policy of Higher Education Commission (HEC) Islamabad Pakistan. More meetings for the course and begin instructions through correspondence for distance teacher training and increase in number of practice teaching lessons, demonstration lessons and final lessons in both programmes.
Article Details
The work published in AjDE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY).
References
Government of Pakistan. (1959) National Commission on Education. Karachi :
Pakistan Press. Guri-Rosenblit, S. (1992). Teachers as a special target population at the Open University of Israel. Open Learning, 7 (1), 40-45. Non-Formal & Distance Education Centre, (2000). Prospectus BEd Distance learning Programme (2000 onwards). Hyderabad , Pakistan : Sindh University Press. Faculty of Education, (2005). Prospectus of BEd/MEd Regular Programme (2005). Hyderabad, Pakistan : Sindh University Press. Robinson, B. (1993). The primary teachers orientation course, Allama Iqbal Open University. In H. Perraton (Ed.), Distance education for teacher training. London :
Routledge. Hofmann, D.W. (2002). Distance learning in higher education. Tec directions, 28-32. Keegan, D. (1986). Foundations of distance education, London : Croom Helm. Keegan, D. (1990). Foundations of distance education (2nd Ed.). London : Routledge. Perraton, H. (2000). Open and distance learning in the developing world. London: Routledge. Schlosser, L.A. (2002). Distance education: Definition and glossary of terms, Definitions and terminology committee . Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Technology. Sharmon, S.R. (1992). Teacher education in India, Vol II. New Delhi : Unmole. Tam, S. (1999). Developing countries and the future of distance education and open learning in the twenty-first century. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology. 3 (1). Retrieved January 3, 2009, from http://www.usq.edu.au/electpub/ejist/article3.html