Face-to-Face Interaction in ODE Language Courses in Iran
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigated the issue of interaction in learning English in open and distance education. To do so, fifty- two distance language learners evaluated the quality of learner content, learner-teacher, learner-learner, learner-interface, and learner-self interactions in general English courses. The results showed that the quality of overall interaction was of middle quality with an asymmetrical pattern in which learner-interface interaction was of the least quality. The results also revealed significant differences among the qualities of most interaction types which, in turn, indicated that offering blended courses for enhancing face-toface interaction could compensate for learner-interface interaction resulted from the low-tech environment.
Article Details
How to Cite
KHODAMORADI, A., & AMERIAN, M. (2012). Face-to-Face Interaction in ODE Language Courses in Iran . Asian Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 54-62. Retrieved from https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/207
Section
Articles
The work published in AjDE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY).
References
Aday, L. (1996). Designing and conducting health surveys. San Francisco, CA : JosseyBass. Ariza, E.N., & Hancock, S. (2003). Second language acquisition theories as a framework for creating distance learning courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4 (2), 1-9. Retrieved October 24, 2009, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/articl e/view/142/222 Berge, Z.L. (1999). Interaction in postsecondary web-based learning. Educational Technology, 39 (1), 5-11. Retrieved December 24, 2009, from http://www.saskschools.ca/~parkland/intera ction.htm Biner, P.M. (1993). The development of an instrument to measure student attitudes toward televised courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 7 (1), 62-73. Cheung, D. (1998). Developing a student evaluation instrument for distance teaching. American Journal of Distance Education, 19 (1), 23-42. Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986). Information gap tasks : Do they facilitate second language acquisition ? TESOL Quarterly, 20 (2), 305325. Egbert, J., & Thomas, M. (2001). The new frontier : A case study in applying instructional design for distance teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (3), 391-405. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (1999). Students' frustrations with a Web-based distance education course. First Monday, 4 (12). Retrieved December 13, 2009 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs /index.php/fm/article/view/710/620 Hillman, D.C., Willis, D.J., & Gunawardena, C.N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education : An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8 (2), 31-42. Keegan, D. (1990). Foundations of distance education (2nd ed.). London : Rutledge. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. Beverly Hills, CA : Laredo Publishing Company. Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages, (pp. 45-77). London : Academic Press.
61
KHODAMORADI & AMERIAN
Long, M.H. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5 (2), 177-193. Long, M.H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition, (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA : Newbury House. Maxwell, L. (1995). Integrating open learning and distance education. Educational Technology November-December, 43-48. Moore, M.G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3 (2), 1-6. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation : What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes ? Language Learning, 44 (3), 493-527. Robertson, H.P. (2002). Interaction : What is it, and how can I include it in online instruction ? Retrieved December 27, 2009, from http://www.uwec.edu/esl/minors/TESOL/F LG378picaNegotiation%20of%20Meaning %20Overview.pdf Saunders, G., & Weible, R. (1999). Electronic courses : Old wine in new bottles ? Internet Research, 9 (5), 339-347. Shale, D., & Garrison, D.R. (1990). Introduction. In D.R. Garrison & D. Shale (Eds.), Education at a distance : From issues to practice, (pp. 1-6). Melbourne : Krieger. Soo, K.S., & Bonk, C.J. (1998). Interaction : What does it mean in online distance education? Paper presented at the Ed-Media
and Ed-Telecom 98 conference, Freibourg, Germany. Spooner, F., Jordan, L., Algozzine, B., & Spooner, M. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in distance learning and oncampus classes. Journal of Educational Research, 92 (3), 132-140. Stella, A., & Gnanam, A. (2004). Quality assurance in distance education : The challenges to be addressed. Higher Education, 47, 143-160. Retrieved December 15, 2009, from http://wenku.baidu.com/view/2a384b0103d 8ce2f006623b1.html?from=related Strambi, A., & Bouvert, E. (2003). Flexibility and interaction at a distance : A mixedmodel environment for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (3), 18-102. Retrieved November 4, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/pdf/strambi.pdf Sutton, L. (2001). The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7 (3), 223-242. Tella, S. (1997). An 'uneasy alliance' of media education and multiculturalism, with a view to foreign language learning methodology. University of Helsinki : OLE Publications. Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press. White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Williams, M., & Burden, R.L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers : A social constructivist approach. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
61
KHODAMORADI & AMERIAN
Long, M.H. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5 (2), 177-193. Long, M.H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition, (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA : Newbury House. Maxwell, L. (1995). Integrating open learning and distance education. Educational Technology November-December, 43-48. Moore, M.G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3 (2), 1-6. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation : What does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes ? Language Learning, 44 (3), 493-527. Robertson, H.P. (2002). Interaction : What is it, and how can I include it in online instruction ? Retrieved December 27, 2009, from http://www.uwec.edu/esl/minors/TESOL/F LG378picaNegotiation%20of%20Meaning %20Overview.pdf Saunders, G., & Weible, R. (1999). Electronic courses : Old wine in new bottles ? Internet Research, 9 (5), 339-347. Shale, D., & Garrison, D.R. (1990). Introduction. In D.R. Garrison & D. Shale (Eds.), Education at a distance : From issues to practice, (pp. 1-6). Melbourne : Krieger. Soo, K.S., & Bonk, C.J. (1998). Interaction : What does it mean in online distance education? Paper presented at the Ed-Media
and Ed-Telecom 98 conference, Freibourg, Germany. Spooner, F., Jordan, L., Algozzine, B., & Spooner, M. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in distance learning and oncampus classes. Journal of Educational Research, 92 (3), 132-140. Stella, A., & Gnanam, A. (2004). Quality assurance in distance education : The challenges to be addressed. Higher Education, 47, 143-160. Retrieved December 15, 2009, from http://wenku.baidu.com/view/2a384b0103d 8ce2f006623b1.html?from=related Strambi, A., & Bouvert, E. (2003). Flexibility and interaction at a distance : A mixedmodel environment for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (3), 18-102. Retrieved November 4, 2009, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/pdf/strambi.pdf Sutton, L. (2001). The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7 (3), 223-242. Tella, S. (1997). An 'uneasy alliance' of media education and multiculturalism, with a view to foreign language learning methodology. University of Helsinki : OLE Publications. Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press. White, C. (2003). Language learning in distance education. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Williams, M., & Burden, R.L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers : A social constructivist approach. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.