Perspectives on a Graduate Online Course that Modeled Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to Teach UDL
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide the instructor and learner perspectives of an online learning technologies course that used Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles to support the teaching of UDL. Course design was based on current standards and literature related to online course design including ADDIE, Quality Matters Standards, and Universal Design for Learning (UDL). The qualitative study was conducted during Spring 2018 at the conclusion of an online course titled, Universal Learning for Online Course Design at a Southwestern University in the US. The instructor provided a design narrative and four graduate students who participated in the course provided learner narratives that were reviewed and analyzed by two external researchers. The findings from this study support continued improvement of course design for the next iteration of the UDL Course, as well as providing ideas for other educators interested in implementing UDL concepts in their courses.
Article Details
How to Cite
PARRA, J., OSANLOO, A., RAYNOR, C., HAIR, S., KORANG, T., PADILLA, C., & CHATTERJEE, S. (2018). Perspectives on a Graduate Online Course that Modeled Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to Teach UDL. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 59 - 87. Retrieved from https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/252
Section
Articles
The work published in AjDE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY).
References
Abdelmalak, M. M. M. (2013). Students' active participation in curriculum design and implementation: A case of a graduate education course. New Mexico State University (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (1517862342) Bichelmeyer, B. (2005). The ADDIE model: A metaphor for the lack of clarity in the field of IDT. IDT Record. Bonner, J. J. (2004). Changing strategies in science education. Science, 306(5694), 228-228. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer Science & Business Media. Burgstahler, S. E. (2015). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice. Harvard Education Press. CAST. (2013). About UDL. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cast.org/udl/index.html CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org Coomber, S. A. (2006). Students with disabilities: Post-secondary voices and universal design for learning (Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of EducationSimon Fraser University). Cornell University (2018). Universal Design. Retrieved on May 10, 2018 from: https://www.cte.cornell.edu/teachingideas/designing-your-course/universaldesign.html Durak, G., & Ataizi, M. (2016). The ABC's of online course design according to Addie model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 20842091.
Duncan-Andrade, J. M., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy. New York, NY: Peter Lang. Edyburn, D. L. (2005). Universal design for learning. Special Education Technology Practice, 7(5), 16-22. Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33-41. Gordon, D., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2016). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J., Lauffer, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S. M., & Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304, 521-522. Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching. Macmillan. Harris, J. (2008). One size doesn't fit all: Customizing educational technology professional development. Part one: Choosing ETPD goals. Learning & Leading with Technology, 35(5), 18. Hodell, C. (2015). ISD from the ground up: A no-nonsense approach to instructional design. American Society for Training and Development. Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2009, November). On becoming a learner: The concept of learning identity. In Essays on Adult Learning Inspired by the Life and Work of David O. Justice. Learning Never Ends. CAEL Forum and News (pp. 513). Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2017). What do instructional designers in higher education really do? International Journal on E-Learning, 16(4), 371-393. Lundeberg, M., Levin, B., & Harrington, H. (1999). Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lundeberg, M. A., & Yadav, A. (2006). Assessment of case study teaching: Where do we go from here? Parts 1 and 2. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(5), 10–13; 35(6), 8–13.
84
PARRA et al.
Gordon, D., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2016). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing. Michele, I., & Preszler, R. (2014). Introductory biology course reform: A tale of two courses. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 5. Moswela, B. (2010). Democratic education in the classroom: An education law perspective. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 2(4), 56-62. National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. National Academies Press. Parra, J., & Bontly, S. W. (2016, June). Transforming learning environments: Co-constructionism in higher education classrooms. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 719-723). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Prensky, M. R. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Corwin Press. Preszler, R. W. (2006). Student-and teachercentered learning in a supplemental learning biology course. Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching, 32(2), 21-25. Preszler, R. W. (2009). Replacing lecture with peer-led workshops improves student learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 182-192. Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBELife Sciences Education, 6(1), 29-41. Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of college science teaching, 36(5), 14. Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 527.
Reynolds, C. R., & Fletcher-Janzen, E. (Eds.). (2007). Encyclopedia of special education: A reference for the education of children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities and other exceptional individuals (Vol. 3). John Wiley & Sons. Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into practice, 47(3), 220-228. Robinson, D. E., & Wizer, D. R. (2016). Universal design for learning and the Quality Matters guidelines for the design and implementation of online learning events. International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning, 12(1). Rose, D. H., & Gravel, J. W. (2010). Technology and learning: Meeting special student’s needs. National Center on Universal Design for Learning. Retrieved from: http://www. udlcenter.org/sites/udlcenter.org/files/T echnologyandLearning.pdf. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2006). A practical reader in universal design for learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Smith, F. G. (2012). Analyzing a college course that adheres to the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 31-61. Taylor, M., Dieker, L., & Delisio, L. (2018). Exhibiting what is learned: Using exhibition assessments and Universal Design for Learning in college teaching. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 3(2). The Quality Matters™ Higher Education Rubric. (2014). The Quality Matters™ Higher Education Rubric. Maryland: Maryland Online, Inc. Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Duncan-Andrade, J. M., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy. New York, NY: Peter Lang. Edyburn, D. L. (2005). Universal design for learning. Special Education Technology Practice, 7(5), 16-22. Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33-41. Gordon, D., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2016). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J., Lauffer, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S. M., & Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304, 521-522. Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching. Macmillan. Harris, J. (2008). One size doesn't fit all: Customizing educational technology professional development. Part one: Choosing ETPD goals. Learning & Leading with Technology, 35(5), 18. Hodell, C. (2015). ISD from the ground up: A no-nonsense approach to instructional design. American Society for Training and Development. Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2009, November). On becoming a learner: The concept of learning identity. In Essays on Adult Learning Inspired by the Life and Work of David O. Justice. Learning Never Ends. CAEL Forum and News (pp. 513). Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2017). What do instructional designers in higher education really do? International Journal on E-Learning, 16(4), 371-393. Lundeberg, M., Levin, B., & Harrington, H. (1999). Who learns what from cases and how? The research base for teaching and learning with cases. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lundeberg, M. A., & Yadav, A. (2006). Assessment of case study teaching: Where do we go from here? Parts 1 and 2. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(5), 10–13; 35(6), 8–13.
84
PARRA et al.
Gordon, D., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2016). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing. Michele, I., & Preszler, R. (2014). Introductory biology course reform: A tale of two courses. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 5. Moswela, B. (2010). Democratic education in the classroom: An education law perspective. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 2(4), 56-62. National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. National Academies Press. Parra, J., & Bontly, S. W. (2016, June). Transforming learning environments: Co-constructionism in higher education classrooms. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 719-723). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Prensky, M. R. (2010). Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. Corwin Press. Preszler, R. W. (2006). Student-and teachercentered learning in a supplemental learning biology course. Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching, 32(2), 21-25. Preszler, R. W. (2009). Replacing lecture with peer-led workshops improves student learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 182-192. Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBELife Sciences Education, 6(1), 29-41. Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of college science teaching, 36(5), 14. Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 527.
Reynolds, C. R., & Fletcher-Janzen, E. (Eds.). (2007). Encyclopedia of special education: A reference for the education of children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities and other exceptional individuals (Vol. 3). John Wiley & Sons. Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into practice, 47(3), 220-228. Robinson, D. E., & Wizer, D. R. (2016). Universal design for learning and the Quality Matters guidelines for the design and implementation of online learning events. International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning, 12(1). Rose, D. H., & Gravel, J. W. (2010). Technology and learning: Meeting special student’s needs. National Center on Universal Design for Learning. Retrieved from: http://www. udlcenter.org/sites/udlcenter.org/files/T echnologyandLearning.pdf. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2006). A practical reader in universal design for learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Smith, F. G. (2012). Analyzing a college course that adheres to the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 31-61. Taylor, M., Dieker, L., & Delisio, L. (2018). Exhibiting what is learned: Using exhibition assessments and Universal Design for Learning in college teaching. Innovative Practice in Higher Education, 3(2). The Quality Matters™ Higher Education Rubric. (2014). The Quality Matters™ Higher Education Rubric. Maryland: Maryland Online, Inc. Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.