Awareness towards Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and their usage for Teacher Education in India
Main Article Content
Abstract
Open and Distance Learning (ODL) system has changing fast with technological advancements and interventions. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have emerged as game changers as they are flexible in time and place as well as are mostly free and non credit granting. Though MOOC has gain momentum worldwide but MOOCs in India are in its primary stage. University Grant Commission (UGC) in India has also notified in 2017 that MOOC courses are to be offered through SWAYAM (Study Webs of Active –Learning for Young Aspiring Minds). MOOCs can be used for pre-service training as well as a very effective tool for in-service professional development. In such emerging scenario, researchers have explored the awareness among teacher educators about use of MOOCs in teacher education. Awareness towards MOOCs among 156 teacher educators was studied under subcategories like awareness about the concept, usability, technology, current practices and the policy guidelines. This study has revealed that teacher educators are having basic idea about MOOCs, their strength, mode of offering the course and benefits. There is confusion regarding the role of the MOOCs for teacher training. There is still a lack of understanding about Indian MOOC initiatives like SWAYAM. Study concluded that there is an emergent need not only to develop proper understanding about MOOCs among teacher educators, but also to provide them facilities to develop and integrate MOOCs in their regular classroom practices. Future for MOOCs in India is bright.
Article Details
The work published in AjDE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY).
References
Hew, K. F. and Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges, Educational Research Review, 12, pp 45-58, retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.20 14.05.001 Jobe, W., Östlund, C., & Svensson, L. (2014). In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1580–1586). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/site s/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/proc eeding_130997%20(3).pdf Khalil, H., & Ebner, M. (2016). What Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Stakeholders Can Learn from Learning Analytics?, Learning, Design, and Technology, pp 1-30 retrieved from https://link.springer.com/reference workentry/10.1007%2F978-3-31917727-4_3-1 Koutropoulos, A., Gallagher, M. S., Abajian, S. C., deWaard, I., Hogue, R. J., Keskin, N. Ö., & Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). Emotive vocabulary in MOOCs: Context & participant retention. The European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?article=507 Kumar, S. and Singh, S. (2017). A study on awareness of ‘OER’ among content creators. Presentation at Open Education Global Conference 2017. Laurillard , D. (2016).The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: Professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29 369 Manning, C., Morrison, B. R., & McIlroy, T. (2014). MOOCs in language education and professional teacher development: Possibilities and potential. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 5(3), 294-308. Muzafaroba, T., & Kaya, E.(2014) Survey of Awareness of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) – a Case of International Black Sea University Students, Georgia retrived from https://www.researchgate.net/publi cation/300061216_Survey_of_Awa reness_of_MassiveOpen_Online_C ourses_MOOCa_Case_of_International_Black_Se a_University_StudentsGeorgia Ovaska, S. (2013). User experience and learning experience in online HCI courses. In P. Kotzé et al. (Eds.): INTERACT 2013, Part IV, LNCS 8120,pp. 447-454. Shakya, M., Shrestha, S. and Manandhar, R. (2016). Awareness of MOOC among College Students: A Study Of Far Western Region of Nepal, International Conference on IT4D, Kathmandu, July 2016 retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publi cation/306057436_Awareness_of_ MOOC_Among_College_Students _A_Study_Of_Far_Western_Regio n_of_Nepal Sharma, R. (2001). Online Delivery of Programmes: A case study of IGNOU. The International Review of Research In Open And Distributed Learning, 1(2). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrod l.v1i2.18
Sharma, R. C., & Mishra, S. (2010). Applications of E-Tutoring at Indira Gandhi National Open University. In G. Berg (Ed.), Cases on Online Tutoring, Mentoring, and Educational Services: Practices and Applications (pp. 185-200). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-8765.ch015 Shigeta, K., Koizumi, M., Sakai, H., Tsuji, Y., Inaba, R. and Hiraoka, N. (2017). A survey of the awareness, offering, and adoption of OERs and MOOCs in Japan, Open Praxis, 9 (02), April–June 2017, pp. 195–206 The Economic Times (2018, June, 25). Teachers resist usage of MOOC, retrieved from http://educationtimes.com/article/5/ 2018062520180623181358687409 4c577/Teachers-resist-usage-ofMOOC-.html UGC (2016). UGC (Credit Framework for Online Learning Courses through SWAYAM) Regulation, 2016. New Delhi, the 20th July, 2016, The Gazette of India, no. 295, retrieved from https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/406 4990_UGC-(Credit-Frameworkfor-Online-Learning-Coursesthrough-SWAYAM)-Regulation,2016.pdf Yuqin, Y. (2016). Chinese Learners’ Perceptions of MOOCs: A Case Study, Ph.D. Dissertation, retrieved from https://dnb.info/1113748001/34