Brazil’s Social Justice Policies for Higher Education: What can we learn from Asia?

Main Article Content

Matheus Batalha Moreira NERY

Abstract

Brazil tertiary education has evolved substantially in the last 20 years. The policies set up by the Brazilian government aimed at different targets. There were actions to expand the enrollments in the country’s public universities, mainly through a program called Reestruturação e Expansão das Universidades Federais (REUNI). The government also invested in increasing the enrollments in private universities and colleges through the government students’ loans program, called Programa de Financiamento Estudantil (FIES), and through a grant program, called Programa Universidade para Todos (PROUNI). And finally, the policymakers also encouraged the development of online distance learning programs as a way to compensate for the lack of higher education opportunities in the areas located far away from Brazil’s most developed cities. The FIES and PROUNI were implemented as social justice policies to create opportunities for students from lower-income families to pursue a higher education degree. However, There are claims that the social justice subsidy model adopted by the Brazilian government isn’t sustainable. On the other side of the world, countries from Asia-Pacific are exploring different strategies to increase both enrollments and quality in tertiary education based on Confucian principles. This Confucian Model led scholars to believe that the Asia-Pacific countries were ready to compete against the tertiary education offered in the western hemisphere. Therefore, firstly, the author’s analysis focuses on the pivotal decisions that shaped Brazil’s higher education system. In sequence, the author examines some key learning points from the Asia-Pacific countries that adopted a tertiary education strategy based on the Confucian Model. The author proposes that to ensure the Brazilian social justice policies efficacy the country’s policymakers should consider developing a more comprehensive rationality involving a long-term thinking strategy for its primary, secondary and tertiary education, mixing government funds and social engagement, in a course of action that can boost academic quality and enrollments. In summary, the author presents recommendations to policymakers, scholars, and HEI administrators regarding the development of Brazilian social justice policies for tertiary education.

Article Details

How to Cite
NERY, M. B. M. (2018). Brazil’s Social Justice Policies for Higher Education: What can we learn from Asia?. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 88 - 108. Retrieved from https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/256
Section
Articles

References

Altbach P.G. (2013). The Asian Higher Education Century?. In: The International Imperative in Higher Education. Global Perspectives on Higher Education. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam Barros, A. S. X. (2014). Vestibular e Enem: Um debate contemporâneo [University’s entrance exam and Enem: A contemporary debate]. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, 22, 1057-1090. BRASIL. Ministério da Fazenda (MF). (2016) Receita Federal do Brasil (RFB). Demonstrativos dos Gastos Tributários – DGT [Tax Expenditures Statements]. Brasília: MF: RFB. Available on: http://idg.receita.fazenda.gov.br/dados/r eceitadata/renuncia-fiscal/previsoesploa/arquivos-eimagens/demonstrativos-dos-gastostributarios-dgt. Accessed May 31, 2018. BRASIL. Câmara dos Deputados. (2016) Execução Orçamentária da União [Brazilian Budgetary Execution] (20002015). Available on: http://www2.camara.leg.br/orcamentoda-uniao/orcamento-da-uniao-emfoco/web_orcamento_uniao_em_foco_a no-2016. Accessed May 31, 2018. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). (2016). Indicadores PIB. Retrieved in August 31, 2016, from http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/ Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). (2018). Indicadores PIB. Retrieved in May 31, 2018, from http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/ Brum, J. A. & Knobel, M. (2017). The International Dimension of the Brazilian Higher Education System Through the Prism of South-South Cooperation. International Journal of African Higher Education. Vol 4, N. 2.
Caixeta, N. Educação. In: Lamounier, B., & Figueiredo, R. (Org.) (2002). A era FHC: um balance [The FHC era: an analysis]. São Paulo: Cultura. Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University (CWTS) (2018). The Leiden ranking. Accessed May 31, 2018 from: http://www.cwts.nl/cwts/LeidenR ankingWebSite.html Chaves, V. L. J., & Amaral, N. C. (2016). Política de expansão da educação superior no Brasil - O Prouni e o FIES como financiadores do setor privado [Policy of expansion of higher education in Brazil - Prouni and FIES as private sector financiers] . Educação em Revista, 32(4), 49-72. Corbucci, P. R. (2000) As universidades federais: gastos, desempenho, eficiência e produtividade [The federal universities: spending, performance, efficiency and productivity]. Brasília: DF: IPEA. Corbucci, P. R. (2004). Financiamento e democratização do acesso à educação superior no Brasil: da desserção do Estado ao projeto de reforma [Financing and democratization of access to higher education in Brazil: from the desertion of the State to the reform project]. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 25, n. 88, p. 677-701. Cunha, L. A. (2004) Desenvolvimento desigual e combinado no ensino superior: Estado e Mercado [Unequal and combined development in higher education: State and market]. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 25, n. 88, p. 795-817, out. Deming, D. J., Goldin, C & Katz. L. F. (2012). The For-Profit Postsecondary School Sector: Nimble Critters or Agile Predators? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26 (1): 139-64. Fávero, M. de L. de A. (2006). A universidade no Brasil: das origens à reforma universitária de 1968 [The university in Brazil: from the origins to the university reform of 1968]. Educar. Curitiba, n 25, p. 17-36, Editora UFPR. Fundo Nacional de Desenvolvimento da Educação (FNDE). (2018). Financiamentos Concedidos [Granted funding]. Retrieved in May 31, 2018, from http://www.fnde.gov.br/financiam ento/fies-graduacao/mantenedora-eies/financiamentos-concedidos

106






NERY

Helms R. M., & Rumbley L. E. (2014) A “Primer” for Global Engagement. In: Rumbley L.E., Helms R.M., Peterson P.M., Altbach P.G. (eds) Global Opportunities and Challenges for Higher Education Leaders. Global Perspectives on Higher Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam Horta, J. S. (1975). A expansão do ensino superior no Brasil [The expansion of higher education in Brazil]. Vozes, Petrópolis, v. 69, n. 6. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP). (2018). Resumo Técnico - Censo da Educação Superior 2015 [Technical Summary - Census of Higher Education 2015]. Available on: www.inep.gov.br. Marginson, S. (2011) Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: rise of the Confucian Model. High Educ. 61: 587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-0109384-9 Martins, C. B. (2009). A reforma universitária de 1968 e a abertura para o ensino superior privado no Brasil [The university reform of 1968 and the opening to private higher education in Brazil]. Educação & Sociedade, 30(106), 15-35. McCowan, T. (2007) Expansion without equity: An analysis of current policy on access to higher education in Brazil. High Educ. 53: 579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-0097-4 Ministério da Educação (MEC). (2017). MEC Transparência [MEC Transparency]. Available on: http://portal.mec.gov.br/secretaria-deregulacao-e-supervisao-da-educacaosuperior-seres/transparencia/30000uncategorised Nery, M. B. M. (2017). Science Without Borders’ Contributions to Internationalization of Brazilian Higher Education. Journal of Studies in International Education 0(0): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315317748526 Rossetto, C. B. de S., & Gonçalves, F. de O. (2015). Equidade na Educação Superior no Brasil: Uma Análise Multinomial das Políticas Públicas de Acesso [Equity in Higher Education in Brazil: A Multinomial Analysis of Public Access Policies]. Dados, 58(3), 791824.
Salto, D. J. (2018) To profit or not to profit: the private higher education sector in Brazil. High Educ. 75: 809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-0170171-8 Secretaria de Educação Superior [SESU]. (2014). A democratização e Expansão da educação superior no país 2003-2014 [The democratization and expansion of higher education in the country 20032014]. (1º Ed.). Brasília: Ministério da Educação. Segenreich, S. C. D. (2009). ProUni e UAB como estratégias de EAD na expansão do ensino superior [ProUni and UAB as ODL strategies in the expansion of higher education]. Pro-Posições, 20(2), 205-222.

Silva, A. F. C. (2013). The diplomacy of professorships: German cultural foreign policy and higher education in São Paulo: The cases of the University of São Paulo and Escola Paulista de Medicina (1934-1942). História, 32(1), 401-431. Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR). (2018). Country ranking. Accessed May 31, 2018 from: https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank .php Vasconcelos, I. M. (2007). A federalização do ensino superior no Brasil [Federalization of higher education in Brazil]. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Departamento de Sociologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF. Vieira, S. L., & Farias, I. M. S. (2007). Política educacional no Brasil [Educational policy in Brazil]. Brasília, DF: Líber Livro. Yang, R. (2015). China’s Soft Power Projection in Higher Education. International Higher Education. No. 46. Wainer, J., & Melguizo, T. (2017). Políticas de inclusão no ensino superior: avaliação do desempenho dos alunos baseado no Enade de 2012 a 2014 [Social justice policies in higher education: performance evaluation of students based on ENADE exams results from 2012 to 2014. Educação e Pesquisa, Epub 12 de janeiro de 2017.