A framework for making most out of online communities of practice tools for reforms in distance learning

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords:
Online Communities of Practice, Social Networking, Learning Technology, Distance Education, Social Learning

Main Article Content

Venkatesan RAMACHANDRAN
S. KUPPUSAMY

Abstract

Distance education has become one of the popular choices among the student's community. More and more students are enrolling into various distance education courses. Technology advancements have created a new avenue in distance education. ICT has helped the universities and colleges in reducing the distance between the students and faculty members. Many of these ICT technologies replicate the physical classroom setup in an online environment. The adoption of social networking sites (SNS) such as LinkedIn, Facebook is increasing rapidly at a much faster phase among the student's community. An increasing number of faculty members in the higher education space have been using these social networking tools in combination with other tools for education delivery and knowledge sharing. Social networking tools are used for building a community of practice among the students enrolled in the program and the faculty members. There is not much research around maximizing the benefits of the use of these social networking platforms and improving the effectiveness of learning. This study aimed to find out the attributes which are vital for making most of these online communities of practice tools and come up with a framework. The researcher performed qualitative research. A carefully designed online questionnaire was sent to a sample set 2000 users and responses were received from 410 users. The researcher used PLS-SEM Model for this research. The outcome of the study revealed that Quality of the Platform and Quality of the content are the critical factors for making most of the COP/SNS platforms. Easy of Navigation and language used for making the content scored high when compared to other attributes.

Article Details

How to Cite
RAMACHANDRAN , V., & KUPPUSAMY, S. (2018). A framework for making most out of online communities of practice tools for reforms in distance learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 146-156. Retrieved from https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/279
Issue
Vol. 13 No. 2 (2018): Asian Journal of Distance Education
Section
Articles

The work published in AjDE is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC-BY).

References

Ajjan, H. &Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating Faculty Decisions to Adopt Web 2.0 Technologies: Theory and Empirical Tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80 Alexander B. (2006) Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning? EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp.32-44. Anderson, T. (2005). Distance learningSocial software’s killer app? Proceedings from Conference of the Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia (ODLAA). Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/d ownload?doi=10.1.1.95.630&rep=rep 1&type=pdf Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. Brady, K. P., Holcomb, L. B., & Smith, B. V. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the e-Learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), 151–170. Chai, K., Potdar, V., Chang, E (2007). A Survey of Revenue Sharing Social Software's Systems. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Social Interaction and Mundane Technologies. Retrieved from: http://www.mundanetechnologies.com/g oingson/workshop/melbourne/papers/C haiPotdarChang.pdf Cheng, R, Vassileva, J (2006). Design and Evaluation of an Adaptive Incentive Mechanism for Sustainable Online Educational Communities. In: Journal of User Modeling and user-adapted Interaction, vol. 16, no. 3-4, pp. 321348 DeSchryver, M., Mishra, P., Koehleer, M., & Francis, A. (2009). Moodle vs. Facebook: Does using Facebook for discussions in an online course enhance perceived social presence and student interaction? In I. Gibson et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 329–336). Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2008). Hybrid online education: Identifying integration models using adventure learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 101– 119 Galusha, J. M. (1997). Barriers to learning in distance education. Interpersonal Computing & Technology, 5(3–4), 6– 14. Greenhow, C. (2011). Online social networking and learning. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology, and Learning, 1(1), 36–50. Grisham, D. L., & Wolsey, T. D. (2006). Recentering the middle school classroom as a vibrant learning community: Students, literacy, and technology intersect. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(8), 648-660. Gürgan, S. (2012). Use of web 2.0 technologies as a means of interaction in open and distance learning: determining the characteristics of a corporate social networking site. Unpublished master's thesis, Anadolu University Institute of Social Sciences, Eskişehir. Retrieved from: https://www.ulusaltezmerkezi.net/aci k-ve-uzaktan-ogrenmede-etkilesimaraci-olarak-web-2-0-teknolojilerininkullanimi-kurumsal-bir-sosyal-agsitesinin-ozelliklerinin-belirlenmesithe-usage-of-web-2-0/
Gurteen, D. (2012). Leading issues in social knowledge management. Academic Conferences Limited. Han, J., Liu, Y.: Dubious Feedback: Fair or Not? In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Scalable Information Systems, article no. 49 (2006) Huang, T. C., Huang, Y. M., & Yu, F. Y. (2011). Cooperative weblog learning in higher education: Its facilitating effects on social interaction, time lag, and cognitive load. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 95–106 Irwin, C., Ball, L., Desbrow, B., & Leveritt, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at the university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1221–1232. Lane, L. (2009). Insidious pedagogy: How course management systems impact teaching. First Monday, 14(10). Lee, M. J. W., & McLoughlin, C. (2010). Beyond distance and time constraints: Applying social networking tools and Web 2.0 approaches to distance learning. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 61–87). Marketo. (2010). The definitive guide to B2B social media: A market workbook. San Mateo, CA, USA. Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I'll see you on "Facebook": The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, effective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1 -17. McCann, K. H. (2009). Virtual communities for educators: An overview of supports and best practices. [Electronic version]. Proceedings from Technology, Colleges, and Community Conference (pp. 137142). McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first-year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729– 740. Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2010). Student LMS use and satisfaction in academic institutions: The organizational perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 127–133. Peters, O. (1992). Some observations on dropping out in distance education. Distance Education, 13(2), 234–269. Schroeder, A., Minocha, S., & Schneider, C. (2010). The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3), 159–174 Schroeder, J., & Greenbowe, T. (2009). The chemistry of Facebook: Using social networking to create an online community for the organic chemistry laboratory. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 5(4). Sheely, S. (2006). Persistent technologies: Why can’t we stop lecturing online? In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear & P. Reimann (Eds), Who’s learning? Whose technology? Proceedings of the 23rd ASCILITE Conference (pp. 769-774).
Donmus, (2010). “The use of social networks in educational computer-game based foreign language learning,” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010, 1497–1503 Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2011). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428–438. Webb, E. (2009). Engaging students with engaging tools. Educause Quarterly, 32(4), 1–7. Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal for Educational Technology, 39(6), 987995. Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836.