Feedback on E-learning at a Telecommunications Company in Malaysia

Main Article Content

CHUI Kit Jen
Manjit Singh SANDHU

Abstract

The prospects for e-learning have grown at a tremendous rate, both in the educational area and in the training area. According to the research firm IDC (International Data Corporation), in the year 2004, the training industry was valued at US$60 billion worldwide, with US$6.6 billion coming from e-learning. By this year, the e-learning market is expected to reach US$23.7 billion. Many organizations and learning institutions have slowly begun adopting elearning as one of their learning tools complementing classroom-based or instructor-led training (ILT) to enhance the effectiveness of the learning or delivery of the training. Despite the enormous amount of money being spent on e-learning, this learning approach is not yet proven to be completely effective. There is a need to evaluate to what extent corporate e-learning is as effective as traditional classroom based learning. With this in mind, this research was conducted to examine employees’ perceptions towards e-learning in a local publicly-listed telecommunications company. An empirical investigation was undertaken by using a sample of 82 employees. Overall, the results indicated that the employees were generally satisfied with their experience of utilising the e-learning courses provided by the company based on instructional design, content, navigation, graphical presentation and audio presentation, with simulation learning being ranked with the highest satisfaction amongst the available types of elearning offered. Feedback on the utilisation of the e-learning based on level of designation and tenure of employment showed significant differences, while gender, department (except in ‘navigation’), and academic qualification, showed no significant differences. Results also indicated that there was no significant association between computer-proficiency level, English-proficiency level, ease of accessibility and usual locations of accessing e-learning and the respective variable(s) of their utilisation of the e-learning courses.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jen, C. K., & SANDHU , M. S. (2006). Feedback on E-learning at a Telecommunications Company in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 4(1), 4-19. Retrieved from https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/65
Section
Articles

References

Stockley, D. (2006). Available online at http://derekstockley.com.au/elearningdefinition.html Stockley, D. (2006). Available online at http://derekstockley.com.au/blendedlearning.html International Data Corporation. (2006). The contributing number of e-learning to the training industry. Available online at http://www.idc.com/home.jhtml Ndubisi N.O. (2005). Factors of on-line learning adoption : A comparative juxtaposition of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal on E-Learning. Sambrook, S. (2002). Factors influencing learning in work : A comparison of two research projects (European- and United Kingdom-based). European Educational Research Journal, 1 (3). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.wwwords.co.uk/pdf/viewpdf.as p?j=eerj&vol=1&issue=3&year=2002&arti cle=8_Sambrook_EERJ_1_3&id=60.48.85. 125 Sandhu, M.S., & Asmawi, A. (2002). Perception of students towards the utilisation of web-based courseware in a virtual learning environment : An empirical investigation in the Universiti Tun Abdul Razak, Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 4 (2). Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.usm.my/dear/v4n2_contents.ht m Sekaran (2003). Measurement : Scaling, reliability, validity. In Research methods for business : A skill building approach. London : John Wiley. Singh H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://www.bookstoread.com/framework/bl ended-learning.pdf. Valiathan, P. (2002). Blended learning models. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2002/aug20 02/valiathan.html