No Age Correlation in the Effectiveness of Corporate E-learning in India

Main Article Content

Monika MITAL
Renu LUTHRA

Abstract

Technological advances are dramatically altering company in-service training and development in India. Although the adoption of online learning programs by Indian organizations has been significant in recent years, the capabilities and efficacy of such programs have yet to be fully investigated. In this study, we have investigated the effectiveness of corporate e-learning through a survey to almost 200 employees working in public and private banks in India, ranging from 30 to 50 years old. The employees had various backgrounds in computer skills, beliefs, and interests and such differences cause different perceptions towards e-learning and thus its effectiveness. We found no age correlation in attitude towards e-learning or towards its uptake and effectiveness. Findings suggested that eliciting actual e-learning needs from the employees, rather than company top-down directive, would enhance attitudes, uptake and effectiveness.

Article Details

How to Cite
MITAL, M., & LUTHRA, R. (2006). No Age Correlation in the Effectiveness of Corporate E-learning in India. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 4(1), 85-89. Retrieved from https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/74
Section
Articles

References

Ausubel, D.P. (1968). Educational psychology : A cognitive view. New York : Holt, Reinhart and Winston. Brown, K.G. (2001). Using computers to deliver training : Which employees learn and why? Personnel Psychology, 54, 271-296. Brown, K.G. (2002). Influence of job characteristics and perceived learning
88
ASIAN JOURNAL of DISTANCE EDUCATION
support on e-learning activity. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto, Canada. Cappelli, P. (1998). The new deal at work : Managing the market-driven workforce. Boston, MA : Harvard University Press. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology : A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003. Greeno, J.G. (1974). Processes of learning and comprehension. Knowledge and Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Guest, D.E. (1998). Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 649-664. Henning, E. (2003). ‘I click, therefore I am (not)’: Is cognition ‘distributed’ or is it ‘contained’ in borderless e-learning programs? International Journal of Training and Development, 7 (4), 303-316. Herriot, P., Hirsch, W., & Reilly, P. (1998). Trust and transition : Managing today’s employment relationship. Chichester : John Wiley. Martin, G., & Beaumont, P.B. (2003). What’s in a name? Building the relationship between branding and people management : Research report. Wimbledon : Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
Martin, G., Beaumont, P.B., & Staines, H. (1998). Determinants of management development : Evidence from Scotland. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 6 (2), 132-145. Miller, F., & Varma, N. (1994). The effects of psychosocial factors on Indian children's attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10 (3), 223-238. Raub, A.C. (1981). Correlates of computer anxiety in college students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Pennsylvania. Reece, M.J., & Gable, R.K. (1982). The development and validation of a measure of general attitudes toward computers. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42 (3), 913-916. Shuell, T.J. (1981). Toward a model of learning from instructions. In K. Block (Ed.), Psychological theory and educational practices : Is it possible to bridge the gap? Los Angeles, CA : American Educational Research Association. Stevenson, H. (1983). Making the grade : School achievement in Japan, Taiwan and the United States. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Center for Advanced Study in Behavioral Science. Rockville, MD. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage : The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19, 561-570.