Reasons Why Students attend Open University in China

Main Article Content

Huiping DING
Robert M. BOODY

Abstract

Although much has been written on the distance education system as a whole in China, little attention has been given to the individual learners, including why they chose to attend. In the past it was not seen as important for Chinese institutions to worry about student perspectives, as there was little flexibility in institutional decision-making. But as more options open up for students, institutions may need to become more entrepreneurial to survive, and thus need to address students' concerns to become more desirable to them. This study was designed to explore student motivations and other perceptions related to attending distance higher education in China. The data reported in this qualitative case study were collected at a Radio and Television University located in Northern China. The following research questions were addressed: (a) What are students' perceptions of their status as students? (b) What is the students' perceived value of the learning achieved via this radio and television university? (c) What are students’ reasons for enrolling in this university? (d) What factors influence students’ perceptions of their status as students and the learning achieved? and (e) What recommendations do students have about changing the current perceptions of distance learning? Data were collected from multiple sources using document review, observation, and interview.

Article Details

How to Cite
DING, H., & BOODY, R. M. (2011). Reasons Why Students attend Open University in China. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 40 - 52. Retrieved from https://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/192
Section
Articles

References

China. (2010). In The world factbook. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the -world-factbook/geos/ch.html


Ding, X. (1994). China’s higher distance education: Its four systems and their structural characteristics at three levels. Distance Education, 15 (2), 327-346. Ding, X. (1995). From Fordism to new-Fordism : Industrialization theory and distance education - A Chinese perspective. Distance Education, 16 (2), 217-240. Keegan, D., & Rumble, G. (1982). The DTUs : An appraisal. In G. Rumble, & K. Harry (Eds.), The distance teaching universities, (pp.225-249). London : Croom Helm. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA : Sage. Spradley, J.P. (1980). Participant observation. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston. United Nations Development Programme. (1994). Human development report 1994. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/ Wu, H., & Ye, Q. (1997). Lifelong learning in the People’s Republic of China. In M.J. Hatton (Ed.), Lifelong learning : Policies, practices and programs, (pp.347-359). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ Yang, R. (2002). Lost opportunities in the massification of higher education in China. International Higher Education, 28, 16-18. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/?SGWID=0-1020-0-0 Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research : Designs and methods (4th edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.