Multimedia Simulation for Electronics Laboratory Activity in India

Main Article Content

Chetana KAMLASKAR

Abstract

Laboratory courses help students to gain insight and understanding of the real world. Use of
combination of interactive simulations and hands on experience in the lab provides more
promising effect as simulation provides illustrations of phenomena that are not easily
visualized. Further interactive simulations allow students to do otherwise more complex and
hazardous experiments, offer full control to manipulate experimental variables and observed
circuit behaviors, which helps to foster a deeper understanding of the experiments. The
objective of this research project was to design and to create an interactive simulation for
electronics lab and evaluate its effectiveness from counselor’s outlook. For this, interactive
simulation was developed on ‘Wien bridge oscillator’ which is one of the lab activities of basic
electronics course offered at 4th semester of B.Tech Electronics Engineering. This paper
presents a study that investigates the effect of using computer simulation. The results from the
evaluation revealed that the simulation package was rated high in the areas of quality content,
quality language, user friendliness, presentation flow, motivation etc. Whereas feedback,
adaptation and auditory support along with visual material representation for visually disable
learner, were areas identified that required enrichment. The findings from the study
demonstrate that developed simulation package is a useful educational tool to improve overall
effectiveness and efficiency of teaching-learning process.

Article Details

How to Cite
KAMLASKAR, C. (2007). Multimedia Simulation for Electronics Laboratory Activity in India. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 5(3). Retrieved from http://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/108
Section
Articles

References

[1]. Born, K.A., & Miller, G. (1999). Faculty perceptions of web-based distance education in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Education, Vol.40, No.3, pp.30-39 [2]. Alessi, S.M., & Trollip, S.R., (1991). Computer-based instruction: Methods and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. [3]. Dooley, K.E., Stuessy, C.L. & Magill, J. (2000). Cognitive and affective outcomes of animation on asynchronous learning of agricultural science concepts. Proceedings, 2000 of the 19th Annual Western Region Agricultural Education Research Conference, pp.29-40. [4]. Gagne, R., (1985). The conditions of learning. 4th ed., New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston [5]. Firth, I. (1972). Simulated experiments in engineering: A pilot evaluation, TERC R&D Papers, 72/20, Tertiary Education Research Center (UNSW), Kensington. [6]. Menn, D. (October 1993). Multimedia in education. PC World, M52-M60. [7]. Mayes, R. L. (1992). The effects of using software tools on mathematical problem solving in secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, Vol .92 No.5, pp.243-248 [8]. Patil, A.S., & Pudlowski, Zenon J. (2003). Instructional design strategies for interactive Web-based tutorials and laboratory procedures in engineering education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, vol.2, no.1. [9]. Hannafin, M. (1997). Better learning with multimedia? Concepts and results from psychology and education, Keynote address given at Multimedia und Internet - NeuePerspektiven für die Bildung, Munich, Germany , http://lpsl.coe.uga.edu/Hannafin/papers/Issing.html [10]. Luann, K. Stemler (1997). Educational Characteristics of Multimedia: A Literature Review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vol 6(3/4), pp. 339- 359