Quality Assurance in Distance Education achieved in the Philippines

Main Article Content

Niel Kenneth F. JAMANDRE

Abstract

This paper analyzes and synthesizes the developments and challenges of the University of the Philippines Open University (UPOU) which offers the Distance Education (DE) Program since 1995. Focusing on the core components of (1) quality of distance education, (2) administrative service, (3) faculty development, and (4) student feedback, this paper reviews and evaluates how the UPOU performs quality assurance and provides an effective mediated learning experience in the tertiary and graduate levels serving its local and overseas Filipino students in 33 different countries. The UPOU reports improvement and faces challenges on: (1) government, private sector, non-governmental organization, and academe support for policy and budget for technology and multimedia upgrade, (2) organizing and training DE scholars, specialists, personnel and practitioners, (3) relevance and competitiveness of programs and curriculum, (4) establishment of more digital learning centers and learning object repositories, (5) strengthening collaboration with other universities, including the Asian Association of Open Universities (AAOU) and in the Southeast Asian Region, (6) student retention and technological support, (8) assessment methods , (9) research agenda, and (10) bridging the ‘pedagogical gap of acceptance’. The UPOU is determined to address these educational realities to prove that DE is beyond an alternative to conventional university, and is a viable academic institution based on a learner-centered paradigm for more Filipino students.

Article Details

How to Cite
JAMANDRE, N. K. F. (2011). Quality Assurance in Distance Education achieved in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), 90 - 97. Retrieved from http://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/173
Section
Special Report

References

Alip, A., et. al. (2004). UPOU online and faceto-face students’ perspectives on support services needs. UPOU Research Monograph Series Vol. 1. Alviar-Escobin, A. (2004). User perceptions of internet technology in distance education. UPOU Research Monograph Series Vol. 1. Annual Report 1996. (1997). University of the Philippines Open University. Annual Report 1997. (1998). University of the Philippines Open University. Annual Report 1998. (1999). University of the Philippines Open University. Annual Report 2000. (2001). University of the Philippines Open University. Annual Report 2001-2007. (2007). University of the Philippines Open University. Annual Report 2007-2009. (2010). University of the Philippines Open University. Bill to institutionalize distance education under study. Committee News. Philippines Congress : House of Representatives in the Philippines. Retrieved May 12, 2010, from http://congress.gov.ph/committees/commne ws/commnews_det.php?newsid=915 Brinkerhoff, R., et. al. (1983). Program evaluation. Boston: Kluwer -Nijhoff Publishing. Distance Education. (1987). Proceedings of the Regional Seminar on Distance Education. Bangkok, Thailand.

96



ASIAN JOURNAL of DISTANCE EDUCATION

Evaluation in distance education. (2004). UPOU Research Monograph Series, Volume 2. Evans, T. (1994). Understanding learners in open and distance education. Londo n : KoganPage. Johri, P. (2005). Modern distance education. India : Anmol. Keegan, D. (Ed.) (1993). Theoretical principles of distance education. London : Routledge. Librero, F. (n.d.). Early years of distance education in the University of the Philippines. Retrieved April 12, 2011, from http://www.upou.edu.ph/papers/flibrero_20 09/earlyyearsofDE.pdf Librero, F. (2005). Some external factors of learning in a knowledge-based society. 19th Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open Universities, Jakarta, Indonesia. Retrieved October 20, 2010, from http://www.idrc.ca/uploads/userS/11285250761F_Librero_PLENARY_PA PER_10805.pdf Lontoc, J. (2010). UPOU expands public
enrollment of paying students. UP Newsletter Vol. xxxi Issue 03. Retrieved October 12, 2010, from http://www.up.edu.ph/upnewsletter.php?i=1 60&archive=yes&yr=2005&mn=10 Madaus, G., Scriven, M., & Stufflebeam, D. (Eds.) (1986). Evaluation models : Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston : KluwerNijhoff Publishing. Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education : A systems view. Wadsworth. Moran, L., & Mugridge, I. (Eds.) (1993). Collaboration in distance education : International case studies. London : Routledge.

Perraton, H. (2007). Open and distance learning in the developing world. London : Routledge. Petras, J. (2010). Personal interview. February 2010. Picciano, A. (2001). Distance learning : Making connections across virtual space and time. London : Prentice-Hall. Quimbo, M.A.T. (2002). A model for evaluating distance education programme. In H.P. Dikshit, S. Garg, S. Panda, & Vijayshri (Eds.), Access & equity : Challenges for open and distance learning, (pp. 196-213). New Delhi : Kogan Page. Readiness towards distance learning (2004). UPOU Research Monograph Series, Volume 1. Simonson, M., et. al. (2006). Teaching and learning at a distance : Foundations of distance education. London : Pearson. Trinidad, A. (2004). Technological and educational preparedness of the Philippines for e-learning : A review of available literature. UPOU Research Monograph Series Vol. 1. University of the Philippines Open University website. http://www.upou.edu.ph http://www.upou.edu.ph/about/history.htm http://www.upou.edu.ph/academic/programs/pro grams.htm http://www.upou.edu.ph/administration/offices.h tm http://www.upou.edu.ph/news/news2009/OUsm eeting.html http://www.upou.edu.ph/news/news2010/15thye ar.html University of the Philippines Open University website. http://www.upou.org/