Academic's Views on Industry 4.0 within the Scope of Open and Distance Education

Main Article Content

Omer OZ
Nilgun OZDAMAR

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to explore the effects of Industry 4.0 on resources (specialization, rationalization, preparatory work, and capital-intensive techniques) in the field of open and distance learning. Industry 4.0 is a period in which a great and rapid change is experienced, has a wide and deep impact that can affect business lines all over the world, and changes in production, management and control systems. For this purpose, within the framework of Otto Peters' theory of Industrialization, the study is a case study based on the opinions of experts in the field of industry-related effects of open and distance learning. The study group consisted of 10 academicians working at Anadolu University Open Education Faculty as experts. For the determination of participants, purposive sampling was used. The purposes of selecting the Anadolu University in research are presenting open and distance learning services since 1982, having the only Distance Education master's and doctoral programs in Turkey and having lecturers who give a lecture about digital transformation and Industrialization. The research was a qualitative case study and the data were collected by a semi-structured interview form consisting of 6 questions by face-to-face interviews with experts. As a result of the analysis, industry 4.0 effects on resources, instructional design, distribution, interaction, learning environment and management components within the context of industrialization theory in open and distance education system. In this direction, it is necessary to eliminate the lack of infrastructure for Industry 4.0, increase digitalization studies and specialize in technological competences. Also, the deficiency of a standardized production concept in Industry 4.0 such as massive production emphasized personalization and individual production in distance education. The distribution of the course materials produced must be diversified and the post-Fordist approach should be preferred in mass production. While industry-wide technologies that trigger Industry 4.0 make it easier to offer different fields of study through distance learning, it affects the centralization and concentration factors in management.

Article Details

How to Cite
OZ, O., & OZDAMAR, N. (2020). Academic’s Views on Industry 4.0 within the Scope of Open and Distance Education. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 58-85. Retrieved from http://asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/477
Section
Articles

References

Anadolum e-Kampus, (2018). Anadolum e-Kampus. https://www.anadolu.edu.tr/e-egItim/anadolum-e-kampus
Aydin, C., H. (2018). MOOCs and change agents, The 2018 OpenupEd Trend Report on MOOCs. http://www.openuped.eu/images/Publications/The_2018_OpenupEd_trend_report_on_MOOCs.pdf
Aybek, H. S. Y. (2017). Üniversite 4.0’a Geçis Süreci: Kavramsal Bir Yaklaşım, Acıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 164-176. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/issue/34117/378453
Balyer, A. & Oz, O. (2018). Academicians Views on Digital Transformation in Education, İnternational Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(4), 809-830. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/441/295
Baris, M., F. & Mevsim, E. (2014). Turkiye’de uzaktan EğItim Merkezi Kurulusu ve Organizasyonu: Namik Kemal UniversItesi Orneği, EğItim ve Oğretim Arastirmalari Dergisi, 3(3), 295-303. http://www.jret.org/FileUpload/ks281142/File/27.baris.pdf
Banerjee, K. (2018). How to incorporate open educational resources (OER) into the infrastructure and pedagogy for promoting ubiquItous learning. İn K., C., Li, K., S., Yuen & B., T., M., Wong (Eds.), İnnovations in Open and Flexible Education, Singapore: Springer.
Barkan, M. & Ozdamar, N. (2007). A Tailor Made E-Learning Solution for Ford/Turkey, New Learning 2.0?, EDEN 2007 Annual Conference, 13-16 June, 2007, Naples, Italy.
Bozkurt, A. (2017). Turkiye’de Uzaktan EğItimin Dunu, Bugunu ve Yarini, Acikoğretim Uygulamalari ve Arastirmalari Dergisi, 3(2), 85-124, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/auad/issue/34117/378446
Brooks, C. & Kanuka, H. (2010). Distance Education in a Post-fordist Time. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), An Intoduction to Distance Education, Understanding Teching and Learning in a New Era. Routledge.
Cleveland-Innes, M. F., & Garrison, D. R. (2010). An Introduction to Distance Education: Understanding Teaching and Learning in a New Era (2nd ed.) New York: Routledge.
Cordes, F. & Stacey, N. (2017). Is UK Industry Ready for the Fourth Industrial Revolution? The Boston Consulting Group. Retrieved from https://media-publications.bcg.com/İs-UK-İndustry-Ready-for-the-Fourth-İndustrial-Revolution.pdf
Creswell, J., W. (2018). Nitel Arastirma Yöntemleri, Ankara: Siyasal KItabevi.
Evans, T. & Pauling, B. (2010). The Future of Distance Education. In M. F. Cleveland-Innes, & D. R. Garrison, (Eds.) An Intoduction to Distance Education, Understanding Teaching and Learning in a New Era. New York: Routledge.
Farnes, N. (1993). Modes of Production: Fordism and Distance Education, Open Learning, 8(1), 10-20.
Feshina, S., S., Konovalova, V. & Sinyavsky, N., G (2018). İndustry 4.0- transition to new economic reality. İn E., G. Popkova, Y., V. Ragulina & A., V. Bogoviz (Eds), İndustry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century, Cham: Springer.
Firat, U., & Firat, Z., O. (2017). Sanayi 4.0 Devrimi Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir İnceleme: Kavramlar, Küresel Gelişmeler ve Türkiye, Toprak İşveren Dergisi, 114, 10-23. http://toprakisveren.org.tr/tr-tr/alt-sayfalar/303/sayi-114
Gokmen, O., F., Duman, I. & Horzum, M., B. (2016). Uzaktan Eğitimde Kuramlar, Değisimler ve Yeni Yönelimler, Anadolu ÜniversItesi, Açıkoğretim Uygulamalari ve Arastirmalari Dergisi AUAd, 2(3), 29-51. http://auad.anadolu.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/167-published.pdf
Herman, M., Pentek, T. & Otto, B. (2015). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios: A Literature Review, Working Paper, 1, Technische UniversItat, Dortmund.
İllés, B., Tamás, P., Dobos, P. & Skapinyecz, R., (2017). New Challenges for Quality Assurance of Manufacturing Processes in İndustry 4.0, Solid State Phenomena, 261, 481-486. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.261.481
Isman, A. (2015). Uzaktan Eğitim, Ankara: PEGEM Akademi.
Kumar, J., Banerjee, D., Gahan, P., & Mohanta, J. (2016). E-Learning Preferred in Tailor-Made to Readymade, İJCA Proceedings on International Conference on Computing and Communication ICCC2016(1), 21-25, Eylül, 2016
Meriam, S., B. & Tisdell, E., J. (2016). Qualitative Research, a Guide to Design and Implementation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Moore, M., G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. İn D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, New York: Routledge.
Moller, L., Robinson D. & Huett, J., B. (2012). Unconstrained Learning: Principles for the Next Generation of Distance Education. İn L. Moller and J. B. Huett (Eds.), The Next Generation of Distance Education, Unconstrained Learning, New York: Springer.
Moore, M., Y. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A Systems View, Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Onday, O. (2017). DijItal Dönüşüm, Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi.
Parlak, B. (2017). DijItal Cağda Eğitim: Olanaklar ve Uygulamalar Üzerine Bir Analiz, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22 (Kayfor15), 1741-1759. https://iibfdergi.sdu.edu.tr/assets/uploads/sites/352/files/yil-2017-cilt-22-sayi-kayfor15-yazi17-30122017.pdf
Patton, M., Q., (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, (4. Edition), California: Sage Publications.
Peters, O. (1967). Das Fernstudium an Universitaten und Hochschulen, Weinheim: Beltz.
Peters, O. (2005). Models for open and flexible learning in Distance Education. In Panda, S. (Ed.). Planning and management in distance education, London: Kogan Page.
Peters, O. (2010). Distance Education in Transition: Development and İssues. BİS-Verlag der Carl von. Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), (2016). 2016 Global İndustry 4.0 Survey: Building the Digital Enterprise. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/industries-4.0/landing-page/industry-4.0-building-your-digItal-enterprise-april-2016.pdf
Prisecaru, P. (2016). Challenges of the Fourth İndustrial Revolution, Knowledge Horizons- Economics, 8(1), 57-62. http://orizonturi.ucdc.ro/arhiva/khe-vol8-nr1-2016/09.%20Petre%20Prisecaru.pdf
Raggatt, P. (1993). Post-Fordism and Distance Education - a Flexible Strategy for Change, Open Learning, 8(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051930080104
Rumble, G. (1983). Distance teaching universities in Europe, Higher Education in Europe, 8(3), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772830080302
Saba, F. (2012). A Systems Approach to the Future of Distance Education in Colleges and Universities: Research, Development and İmplementation, Continuing Higher Education Review, 76. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1000649
Schwab, K. (2016). Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi, World Economic Forum, İstanbul: Optimist Yayin Dağıtım.
Shamim, S., Cang, S., Yu, H., & Li, Y. (2016, s.5311). Management Approaches for İndustry 4.0., a human resource management perspective, İEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Conference Paper, 5309-5316.
Tung, T., T. & Long, D., T. (2018). Open Learning Opportunities for Adults in the İndustrial Revolution 4.0, Open Education in Human Resource Development in Asia’s Period of İntegration, the 32nd Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open Universities, 24-26 October 2018, Vietnam.
World Economic Forum (WEF), (2016). The Future of Jobs, Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth İndustrial Revolution, Global Challenge İnsight Report. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf
Xing, B. & Marwala, T. (2017). Implications of the Fourth İndustrial Age on Higher Education, Arxiv. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1703/1703.09643.pdf
Xu, M., David, J., M. & Kim, S., H. (2018). The Fourth İndustrial Revolution: opportunities and Challenges, International Journal of Financial Research, 9(2), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v9n2p90
Yamamoto, G., T. (2018). Türkiye’de Yüksekoğretim Sistemi Üzerine Düşünceler, Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(3), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.482681
Yin, R., K. (2014). Case Study Research, Design and Methods, (5. Baskı), London: Sage Publications.
Zamawe, F., C. (2015). The İmplication of Using NVivo Software in Qualitative Data Analysis: Evidence-Based Reflections, Malawi Medical Journal, 27(1), 13-15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4478399/